|
|
|
|
 Free Agents Oakland REC 45, Warriors 40 |
CLICK HERE OR SCROLL DOWN FOR GAME STATS |
| Warriors and Count It Launch Playoffs
APRIL 15, 2006 -- The E#4 Warriors and W#5 Count It launch the playoffs with a "play-in" game this Sunday 4/16. The rest of the bracket has the week off for Easter.
The Warriors finished as the 8th-best team in the league as a result of a three-way tiebreaker with 3-win and 5-loss teams Faded and Geraldo Bayawa. Here is an opportunity to understand the NFL tiebreaker system in greater detail. When the NFL decides its Wild Card teams, it first looks for head-to-head matchups which will setup certain constraints, then it goes to a process of elimination by division (in our case, by conference).
First off, Bayawa beat the Warriors head-to-head. Meanwhile, Bayawa and Faded were deadlocked with a split in their head-to-head. Unfortunately for the Warriors, this meant that the Warriors could not possibly finish ahead of Bayawa. So the next question by process of elimination is, who wins between Bayawa and Faded? With the common opponents record deadlocked, we had to resort to strength-of-victory (average point differential in games won, not including forfeits). Faded easily won that comparison, so with that we have Faded, then Bayawa, then the Warriors.
We would have started the playoffs on 4/16 for all teams, but a couple teams had Filipino/Catholic commitments, so the rest start on 4/23. Since we will re-seed depending on the results each week, in order to promote schedule diversity, it's no use putting up a bracket at this point.
Along with the Warriors and Count It, Faded and Geraldo Bayawa are also saddled with single-elimination status. But remember, the Winners Bracket is no different than any other playoff bracket. Win three games in a row and you're in. By the fourth game, the championship, the other team will be a survivor of the Losers Bracket, so it's a one-game showdown anyways (we only get repeat championship matchups when the Winners Bracket survivor has double-elimination status and loses during that fourth round). | Boxscore | Warriors - 40 |
| Player | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | F | PTS |
| Casem, Scott | 0 / 3 [0.000] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chang, Mike | 2 / 6 [0.333] | 1 / 3 [0.333] | 1 / 2 [0.500] | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Chong, Pete | 3 / 9 [0.333] | 1 / 2 [0.500] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Dang, Hoa | 6 / 9 [0.667] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 2 / 4 [0.500] | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 14 |
| Kwang, Ethan | DNP |
| Lam, Sonny | 2 / 6 [0.333] | 0 / 1 [0.000] | 0 / 3 [0.000] | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Park, Soo | DNP |
| Quach, Ethan | 3 / 9 [0.333] | 0 / 1 [0.000] | 0 / 2 [0.000] | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Wong, Fang | 1 / 5 [0.200] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 1 / 1 [1.000] | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| | 17 / 47 [0.362] | 2 / 7 [0.286] | 4 / 12 [0.333] | 44 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 15 | 40 |
| Free Agents Oakland REC - 45 |
| Player | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | F | PTS |
| Chin, Mark (dup) | DNP |
| Don, Terry | 1 / 2 [0.500] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Haynes, Kevin | DNP |
| Kim, David | 2 / 6 [0.333] | 0 / 2 [0.000] | 2 / 4 [0.500] | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Lee (Oak), Jimmy | 5 / 11 [0.455] | 3 / 4 [0.750] | 5 / 10 [0.500] | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 |
| Lin, Le Shang | DNP |
| Maw, Li | DNP |
| Plang, Rob | 3 / 11 [0.273] | 3 / 7 [0.429] | 2 / 2 [1.000] | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| Tong, Anthony | 1 / 2 [0.500] | 1 / 2 [0.500] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Wong, Felix | DNP |
| Yen, James | 0 / 4 [0.000] | 0 / 2 [0.000] | 0 / 0 [0.000] | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| z-Other, 1 | 1 / 1 [1.000] | 1 / 1 [1.000] | 2 / 2 [1.000] | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| | 13 / 37 [0.351] | 8 / 18 [0.444] | 11 / 18 [0.611] | 31 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 45 |
|